Member of BTG Global Advisory

Understanding preference in insolvency and why you should avoid making preferential payments

When a company enters administration or is liquidated, the conduct of directors leading up to insolvency will be investigated to find out if they have acted wrongfully or unlawfully. One type of transaction that comes under scrutiny in this situation is preferential payments.

It is incumbent upon directors to maximise returns for all creditors once insolvency is threatened - to do otherwise could be viewed as acting unlawfully. Directors must set aside their own interests and those of the company, and under the ‘pari passu’ principle, ensure that creditors within each class are treated equally as far as repayment/losses are concerned.

What constitutes a preferential payment?

‘Preference’ occurs when a particular creditor is placed in a more beneficial position, to the detriment of the remaining creditors in that group. For example, repaying a loan from someone connected to the company, such as a director’s relative, or making sure that a creditor is paid simply to encourage an ongoing business relationship post-insolvency.

If a director has provided a specific lender with a personal guarantee, they might be inclined to repay this loan first to protect their personal finances. This too could be seen as a preference in insolvency. Preferences include the transfer of assets in addition to cash payments.

Parameters for judging whether a payment is preferential

When deciding whether payments should be treated as preferential, consideration is given to the length of time between the transaction and the onset of insolvency. There are two aspects to this:

  • If the transaction involved a ‘connected party’ such as a relative of the director, the timescale is two years before the onset of insolvency
  • For non-connected recipients, the time limit is six months

The date of insolvency could be when the petition for an administration order is presented, the filing date of Notice of Intent to Appoint, or the date on which winding-up begins. If a company has struggled on for a period of time without actually becoming insolvent, a payment that was indeed preferential, could be overlooked simply because of the timescale.

What are the ramifications of making a preferential payment?

Directors could face personal liability for some or all of the company’s debts if a preference is found to have been made. The insolvency practitioner will apply to the court for the transaction(s) to be set aside, and action may be taken against you.

If the preferential payment was made when the company was insolvent, or caused it to become insolvent, it could lead to disqualification as a director for a period of up to 15 years.

To find out more about preferences in insolvency, and to ensure you are acting accordingly as a company director, call our expert Begbies Traynor team. We can advise on whether your actions might be investigated, and discuss the options available. With a nationwide office network, we can also offer a same-day consultation in complete confidence, free of charge.

Contact our team

Processing...
Latest News
KCP investment boosts domiciliary care provider Routes Healthcare
KCP investment boosts domiciliary care provider Routes Healthcare
Growing domiciliary care business Routes Healthcare, which provides NHS-funded intensive home care, has received a substantial investment from private equity firm Key Capital Partners (KCP) which has …
The Problems with Using Unlicensed Insolvency Advisers
The Problems with Using Unlicensed Insolvency Advisers
If your business is struggling to stay afloat and meet creditor demands, you may find that unlicensed insolvency advisers will claim to have all the answers to your questions. However, only licensed i…
Begbies Traynor Welcomes R3 Guidance on Dealing with Personal Debt Problems
Begbies Traynor Welcomes R3 Guidance on Dealing with Personal Debt Problems
The insolvency trade body R3 has published a new guidance document on the subject of how best to deal with the prospect of personal insolvency as a UK individual. As experts in both personal and corpo…
Historic construction and restoration company William Anelay placed into administration
Historic construction and restoration company William Anelay placed into administration
On 8 September 2016, Julian Pitts and Bob Maxwell of Begbies Traynor were appointed as joint administrators of William Anelay Ltd; one of Britain’s longest-established construction and heritage restoration companies
Director promotion at Begbies Traynor Preston
Director promotion at Begbies Traynor Preston
Ian McCulloch has been promoted to the position of Insolvency Director at Begbies Traynor's Preston office after eight years with the firm
First Ruling of Section 342A of the Insolvency Act
First Ruling of Section 342A of the Insolvency Act
Mark Raeside QC presided over four separate days in the High Court last week as Section 342A of the Insolvency Act was finally ruled upon, directing what constitutes an excessive contribution to a pension scheme which can be set aside by a trustee in bank

Advice You Can Trust

Insolvency Practitioners Association Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales R3: Association of Business Recovery Professionals ICAEW Business Advice Service Turnaround Management Association ACCA (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) ICAS | The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland
Menu